• welcome

    Amber vs Pharo syntax differences

    Next Topic
     
    classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
    2 messages Options
    Reply | Threaded
    Open this post in threaded view
    |

    Amber vs Pharo syntax differences

    Michael Burns
    Is there a comparison or summary doc for Amber syntax and Pharo?

    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
    To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/amber-lang/b9bf34af-4f18-4702-8e8f-48ecf0d7d0a6n%40googlegroups.com.
    Reply | Threaded
    Open this post in threaded view
    |

    Re: Amber vs Pharo syntax differences

    Herby Voj?ík
    On 18. 5. 2021 23:39, Michael Burns wrote:
    > Is there a comparison or summary doc for Amber syntax and Pharo?

    Probably not (or I can't remember), but I have the impression that the
    syntax is (so far) _very_ similar.

    The only difference that come to mind is that Amber does not have byte
    arrays
       #[65 66 67]

    but it has "inline HashedCollection"
       #{ #foo -> 3. 'bar' -> [3 + 4] value }

    Herby

    P.S.: Of course, unless new Pharo versions added something completely new...

    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email].
    To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/amber-lang/673f7d2d-8295-3a59-364f-c57a80205dc9%40mailbox.sk.

    日韩在线旡码免费视频

    HoMEպߔƵ